Artboard 2 copy 35Artboard 64 copy 13Artboard 2 copy 19Artboard 2 copy 31Artboard 64 copy 18Artboard 64 copy 10Artboard 64 copy 11Artboard 64 copy 15Artboard 64 copy 12Artboard 64 copy 13Artboard 64 copy 14Artboard 2 copy 34Artboard 64 copy 19Artboard 64 copy 16MinusArtboard 2 copy 44Artboard 2 copy 38Artboard 2 copy 36PlusArtboard 64 copy 17Artboard 2 copy 43Artboard 2 copy 45Artboard 2 copy 46Artboard 64 copy 16Artboard 64 copy 18Artboard 64 copy 19Artboard 64 copy 17

Job-exposure matrices addressing lifestyle to be applied in register-based occupational health studies [Epub ahead of print]

Tidsskriftartikel - 2018

Resume

OBJECTIVES: Information about lifestyle factors in register-based occupational health studies is often not available. The objective of this study was therefore to develop gender, age and calendar-time specific job-exposure matrices (JEMs) addressing five selected lifestyle characteristics across job groups as a tool for lifestyle adjustment in register-based studies.

METHODS: We combined and harmonised questionnaire and interview data on lifestyle from several Danish surveys in the time period 1981-2013 for 264 054 employees registered with a DISCO-88 code (the Danish version of International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO)-88) in a nationwide register-based Danish Occupational Cohort. We modelled the probability of specified lifestyles in mixed models for each level of the four-digit DISCO code with age and sex as fixed effects and assessed variation in terms of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and exposure-level percentile ratios across jobs for six different time periods from 1981 through 2013.

RESULTS: The ICCs were overall low (0.26%-7.05%) as the within-job group variation was large relative to the between job group variation, but across jobs the calendar period-specific ratios between highest and lowest predicted levels were ranging from 1.2 to 6.9, and for the 95%/1% and the 75%/5% percentile ratios ranges were 1.1-2.8 and 1.1-1.6, respectively, thus indicating substantial contrast for some lifestyle exposures and some occupations.

CONCLUSIONS: The lifestyle JEMs may prove a useful tool for control of lifestyle-related confounding in register-based occupational health studies where lacking information on individual lifestyle factors may compromise internal validity.

Reference

Bondo Petersen S, Flachs EM, Prescott EIB, Tjønneland A, Osler M, Andersen I, Juel K, Budz-Jørgensen E, Kolstad HA, Schlünssen V, Bonde JP. Job-exposure matrices addressing lifestyle to be applied in register-based occupational health studies [Epub ahead of print]. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2018.
doi: 10.1136/oemed-2018-104991

Gå til Tidsskriftartikel